Friday, December 3, 2010

Fort Worth Streetcar Meeting Update

Over 300 people and guess what, they all have an opinion.  Sounds like the majority say no way.  Funny, that's what they say about most of the things that are done the Fort Worth Way. 

Lots of great speakers last night!  Kudos to you all!

There was information in the Fort Worth Star-Telegram about the pre-meeting meeting and the meeting as well as on NBCDFW.com.  Too bad we weren't invited to the behind the scenes meeting, sounds like it was a good one.  We'll give you some highlights below.  Consider it your incentive to be informed!  We noticed neither news source said the consulting company HDR is where a lot of the story information came from.  Does the price tag jump from the original plan, remind anyone else of the Trinity River Vision scheme?  We did notice, the majority of Fort Worth is left out of the loop...

Question to you WHO support and want to spend the Trinity River Vision TIF on the streetcar, WHERE do you think that money comes from? 

Fort Worth takes pride in resolving disagreements behind the scenes and presenting a united front. So nobody is talking publicly about the clashes that played out Monday, when about 15 heavy-hitters met in two sessions, for almost six hours, to try to hash out their differences.


Skeptics, including leaders from Downtown Fort Worth Inc. and the Fort Worth Chamber of Commerce, insisted that they were just asking questions and vetting the numbers. Streetcar supporters, including the Trinity River Vision Authority and Fort Worth South, said that they felt ambushed and that the challenges were a pretense for killing the project.

Tempers flared, and some cautioned that the attacks were getting too personal.

We're talking about three miles of track at $85 (million) to $86 million," said Paul Rudisill, a business owner opposed to the project. "When it was first proposed, it was about $53 million. So 22 percent have access to it, while 78 percent will be paying for operational costs of it. That's ridiculous."

"Expensive? Yes. It's an investment for the future. A lot of the things that we do today hopefully will pay for themselves in the future. But we've got to start."

A good number of people Thursday at the Fort Worth Convention Center were skeptical of the $88 million estimate presented for the total cost of the project and the notion of adding expenses during a slow economic period.

One speaker pointed out that the estimates of the Trinity River Vision, which started out at $320 million in 2003, have soared to near $1 billion today. Many others said the project would benefit too few people.

Cleveland Harris said he believed that to be true but objected to the proposal because his neighborhood is not part of the plans.

"If it leaves us out of the loop, we're against it," said Harris, the director of government affairs for the Morningside Neighborhood Association. "They need to promote the whole city, not just a portion of the city."

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

The information in your first paragraph is very incorrect. Were you not there? They ran out of 'against' cards to call up to the mic, so the last part as all 'for' citizens.

Anonymous said...

Let's get real. If Moncrief and his cronies of tax pirates want it, and it looks like they do and been planning on it for quite a while, the council will vote for it after the obligatory act by the mayor about his solemn duty to "make the tough choices".

The Star-Telegraph said...

Anon,
Yes we were there. And we saw the difference in the speakers. It was obvious WHO spoke for THE PEOPLE of Fort Worth and WHO spoke for a few of their friends downtown. After the morning meeting, seems some of the troops were called in to repay some favors. Wonder what that will cost?

Anonymous said...

Hi. Just found this blog while googling "streetcars and Fort Worth". I was at the town hall too and want to weigh in on this convo.

When I saw the 'no' speakers, I saw a bunch of old, angry people who won't be paying taxes for much longer. When I saw the 'yes' speakers I saw younger, progressive people who will be paying taxes in this city for the next thirty or so years. The question that I thought was so clearly brought up by that town hall was: Who's Fort Worth do we need to plan for? I think the answer is clear as day. I'm sensing a turnover in the Fort Worth votersphere. It is probably irritating to older people who don't want to pay for something they will not be able to enjoy the benefits of.

The Star-Telegraph said...

Anon 2 -
For starters we are a "no" and we aren't "old". And don't worry, we're sensing a turnover in the votersphere too.