Wednesday, April 29, 2009

Not a drop to drink Part 2


Whisper the two words “Barnett Shale” and before you know it, a crowd will gather to listen as if you are about to deliver the Sermon on the Mount.

The largest natural gas play in the country, right here in Tarrant County, has made a number of local residents millionaires and created much more than a cottage industry. It’s the equivalent of a large, gated housing community or even a small city.

Numerous opportunities abound with the Barnett Shale exploration and success, as do numerous challenges. Municipalities such as the city of Fort Worth, for instance, are watching their coffers bulge from gas-well royalties and leases on city-owned property. Many observers correctly worry that the city will increase spending at a rate commensurate with its newfound source of revenue, only to leave taxpayers holding the bag – an empty bag – when the flow of gas and money either drops off substantially or dries up completely.

Most wells do not produce forever. Revenue almost certainly will decline – and the decline could be both drastic and rapid.

Other questions revolve around environmental impact, both in the wide-open spaces and ranchland areas of Tarrant County and in neighborhoods where associations of homeowners, once focused on planning their Fourth of July parades, now spend time listening to lectures on gas leases and drilling regulations.

Last fall, the Fort Worth Business Press launched a series of seminars to discuss various aspects of the Barnett Shale. We offer explanations and what amount to mini-lectures by experts, many of whom are lawyers who make presentations as panelists.

For our most recent Barnett Shale Symposium, a standing-room-only crowd gathered at the Fort Worth Hilton to hear several speakers discuss Barnett Shale-related issues, including the growing impact of gas-well drilling on the area’s water supply. Bill Meadows, a former Fort Worth city councilman and a member of the Texas Water Development Board, served as moderator; the featured speaker was Robert Mace, the Water Development Board’s division director of groundwater resources.

Mace is among the state’s most noted authorities on water – particularly the Trinity Aquifer, which is the primary source of groundwater for our region.

Mace warned that over time the aquifer will face serious depletion issues. It will become more and more difficult to supply all the water we need as Tarrant County continues to grow, both industrially and residentially. Exploration in the Barnett Shale also puts pressure on the availability of water.

While the general public apparently found such issues compelling enough to spend several hours pondering them and asking questions about them in a packed hotel ballroom, members of the board that governs the Tarrant Regional Water District were conspicuous by their absence.

You might think that a group of public officials whose primary mission is to manage the area’s water resources and ensure an ample supply of clean, safe water for homes and businesses would want front-row seats for a program dealing in such depth with their area of responsibility. But of course the water board’s attention in recent years has been focused less and less on its real job – water management and preservation – and more and more on its latest plaything, the $435 million extravagance known as the Trinity River Vision.

Perhaps if we had devoted part of our symposium to a discussion of town lakes, riverwalks and the economic development benefits of eminent domain, water board members would have found time to attend. Maybe next time.

While the water board fiddles with the river, North Texas is desperately in need of inspired and dedicated leadership to preserve our precious water reserves for ourselves and for future generations.

Elected officials, including water board members, city council representatives, county commissioners and state legislators, need to step forward and confront the looming water crisis. If the people’s leaders don’t care enough to learn all they can about this crucial issue, then the people need to find some new leaders. And, based on the burgeoning level of public interest in this subject, the people may be gearing up to do just that.

Meanwhile, we’re struck with a regional water board that is clearly more interested in economic development than in water preservation, so the public needs to put some pressure on board members. One way to do it would be to attend the board’s meetings, which are held at 9:30 a.m. on the third Tuesday of every month. The meetings are conducted at the water district’s administrative offices, 800 E. Northside Drive in Fort Worth.

Maybe some of the board’s constituents who attended our symposium could pass along some of what they learned about water to the water board. The water board could certainly use the information.

For the record

We were perusing some FW Weekly articles and came across some interesting notes, most of these come from the "Best Of" Editions. We hope they are working on an election edition.

In 2002:

Best Elected Official -
Clyde Picht

In 2006:

Waste Of Taxpayer Money -
Readers' choice: Trinity River Project

In 2007 :

Example of Gumption or Grit
Critic's choice: Gary Hogan
You can almost hear city officials, sounding eerily similar to Col. Klink, saying, "Hooogaaaan ....." No wonder - one of the strongest and most rational voices representing neighborhood interests in the natural gas boom has been that of this mustachioed Westsider. Despite finding himself outgunned while serving on a 2005 gas drilling ordinance task force that was heavily stacked in favor of the industry, Hogan never lost focus or alienated himself. He fought for 1,000-foot buffer zones between homes and wells (the task force raised the buffer from 300 to 600 feet only after a fatal Forest Hill blowup), and he predicted widespread devaluations of property. Two years later, he remains a viable voice of the people as the scope of drilling intensifies. The city could use more folks like him.

(While Steve isn't currently running for anything that we know of, he is always involved on behalf of the citizens)

Watchdog

Critic's choice: Steve Hollern
Hollern is the former chair of the Tarrant County Republican Party, but has stayed active in the community even after moving out of the job. His latest mission is getting signatures to put a referendum on the ballot that would cap spending on the Trinity River Vision project. He's working hard against the so-called flood-control project that keeps getting more and more expensive. This goes against the city's party line, but Hollern is doing his best to keep this boondoggle from becoming an even more massive waste of taxpayer dollars.

Public Debate
Public officials are supposed to be, for lack of a better word, public. That means our elected officials need to be responsive to the voters, both in terms of being available to answer concerns and being able to articulate a vision for the community. Fort Worth Mayor Mike Moncrief has decided he needs to do none of these. He rarely attends neighborhood community meetings, doesn't talk much to the media, and, quite frankly, acts as if he is above all that. Some might think this criticism of Mike has to do with his refusal to talk to the Weekly and telling the other council members to stonewall us as well. Sure, we'd prefer he talk to us, but in some respects he has dropped a present in our lap. Many neighborhood leaders are now rallying around this newspaper, working more closely with us on big-city issues. But that's not enough, in the bigger picture of what's good for the city. Cowtowners need to ditch the back-room Fort Worth Way and embrace vigorous debate in the public arena. Just because Dallas can't do it without a lot of red faces and bitterness shouldn't stop us - we do other things better, we can do this better as well.

In 2008:
Thing Tarrant County Needs
Critic's choice: A revolutionary with moxie
Lots of folks are whining about how the gas drilling companies are taking over Fort Worth, stepping on its citizens, and controlling city hall. Whine, whine, whine. This city needs somebody to go all Pancho Villa on somebody's ass - in a nonviolent way - and really kick up some resistance against city officials and corporate robber barons who treat residents like floor mats and rely on unfair laws put in place by co-opted legislators.

Politician Most Likely to Sell Grandma to the Highest Bidder
Readers' choice: Fort Worth Mayor Mike Moncrief

Bloggers busy this week

With the election upon us, lots of talk going around. Remember - don't sell your vote, be informed!

West and Clear discussions still going...

And Durango's been busy too.

Monday, April 27, 2009

People want to know

More details on the TRV, please

City leaders say there is no money to renovate our existing but neglected Heritage Park, touted for its grand view of the historic confluence of the West and Clear forks of our Trinity River. At the same time they eagerly continue to support a nonexistent vision.

The Trinity River Vision proposes to destroy the natural confluence of the Trinity to develop commercial property in its place where canals, bridges and a lake will require massive earth moving by the Army Corps of Engineers to prevent flooding just below the bluff where the Tarrant County Courthouse stands.

Descriptions have been vague, but recently a brochure produced for TRV explained that the canals and bridges are modeled after a project designed in Vancouver, B.C., a part of the hemisphere that has almost nothing in common with Fort Worth in the way of climate, culture and water supply.

The TRV brochure reports two trips by TRV advisors to Vancouver to visit the football field-sized model of the Trinity River Vision Central City project. The bypass channel and flood gates of the model demonstrate protection of more than 2,400 acres of neighborhoods possibly subject to flooding in uptown Fort Worth as a result of the channel and associated levees.

J.D. Granger, executive director of the TRV Authority and son of U.S. Rep. Kay Granger, was quoted in part as saying, “We’ve been able to make minor modifications in the design that will save us millions in erosion maintenance costs.”

Let us please learn more about projected maintenance costs and possible flooding. In times threatening depression and drought, when our president asks us to eliminate earmarks, we must know the facts to act wisely and responsibly.

How much taxpayer money is being spent to fund the Trinity River Vision, and how many millions do we guess it will take to finish and maintain it? Residents of Fort Worth deserve a full and open accounting.

— Betty W. Fay, Fort Worth

(This letter was in the daily paper last month, we've not seen an answer yet, have you?)

Where were you?

Candidate forum tonight, all District 6 candidates attended, as well as Clyde Picht and Louis McBee. No mayor, no surprise.

Liked what we heard from the candidates. Again, we were impressed with Glen Bucy. If you are a voter in District 6, look him up.

Shame that the location could hold 2000 people, maybe 50 showed. So, where were YOU?

Who does the city belong to?

We found this comment online (it was in response to the City pulling the candidate interviews last week).

What is it with the city leaders? If a person appears at a City Council meeting to speak, they are not allowed to criticize the City staff or the City Council under any circumstance.

The City Council and others are given all the time they wish to slap each other on the back and shower praises for the great things they are doing.

CITIZENS ARE ALLOWED ONLY 3 MINUTES TO VOICE CONCERNS.

There has been recent criticism of the City Council and mayor for censorship when truthful facts were being presented, at which time the mayor would 'warn them about the rules'. (his rules) Those facts may include names or the wrongdoing of the City staff or City Council who were acting inappropriately. Why is that wrong?

The City manager the Mayor and City Council does not want the criticism being aired on the City's television station. They do not want the citizens to know of the poor performance that has taken place.

Why do you think there are so many people running for offices? The citizens are tired of all of the back door deals, the censorship, being told about the balanced government when the Mayor and Council have dictated who is on Task Force and what they are allowed to talk about. The task Force then would feed back what the industry wants.

We now have a public access television station that is being monitored and censored by the City manager. So much for transparency and open government. Don't we criticize China and Iran for exactly the same thing.

The Mayor, City Council and City staff think the citizens are at the mercy of their wishes. It is time to tell them with our votes, they work for us. We need public Officials who understand they are in their position at the will of the people.

WE ARE NOT THEIR SUBJECTS. THIS IS OUR CITY.

Posted by: jimsplace

Saturday, April 25, 2009

FTW Survivor

We like the way Durango explains things.
Early voting starts Monday.

Friday, April 24, 2009

Reminder

Prairie Fest is Saturday!

Just in time

The candidates are back on! Good job all! Now - go watch them!!